1. Attribution and analytics platforms
Off-the-shelf tools couldn't stitch your data sources. Your team built one - and it broke, and they fixed it, and it broke differently. That iteration is experimentation.
The honest wedge
Marketing services don't qualify for SRED - campaigns, creative, media buying, market research. That's the part everyone gets right. What they miss: the custom technology your agency builds to deliver those services can qualify, and for most agencies it's worth $30,000โ$100,000+ per year in refundable credits.
Never qualifies
If a consultant tells you this stuff qualifies, walk away. That's how agencies get burned and audited.
Often qualifies
Custom technology built because off-the-shelf tools failed - where your team hit real technical walls and iterated through them. CRA decides; we assess and document.
Assessment only ยท CRA decides eligibility
Six patterns
Off-the-shelf tools couldn't stitch your data sources. Your team built one - and it broke, and they fixed it, and it broke differently. That iteration is experimentation.
Ad platforms, CRMs, client systems that fight back. If your devs had to reverse-engineer behavior, that's technological uncertainty.
Fine-tuned models, custom agents, classification systems - when accuracy plateaus forced real iteration, not just prompt tweaks.
Pipelines that had to survive real-world volume. Retries, race conditions, data consistency - engineering problems, not marketing ones.
Portals, reporting engines, bidding tools - where the hard part was system behavior, not features on a roadmap.
The tool you abandoned after three months still generated technical knowledge. Failed projects can be the strongest claims.
Honesty block
For a typical agency, 20โ40% of technical staff time is claimable - and claiming more than you should is how you end up in a CRA review. Our job is finding the real number and defending it, not inflating it.
Not sure which bucket your work falls in? That's the whole point of the free call.